• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Menoufia Journal of Plant Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 10 (2025)
Volume Volume 9 (2024)
Volume Volume 8 (2023)
Volume Volume 7 (2022)
Volume Volume 6 (2021)
Volume Volume 5 (2020)
Volume Volume 4 (2019)
Volume Volume 3 (2018)
Volume Volume 2 (2017)
Volume Volume 1 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Abd El-Salam, M., Shaker, S., El-Shoraky, F., Hamed, E. (2015). BEHAVIOR OF SOME COTTON GENOTYPES UNDER TWO GROWING TECHNIQUES. Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 40(1), 99-108. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2015.321132
M. A. Abd El-Salam; S.A. Shaker; Fathia S. El-Shoraky; E.M. Hamed. "BEHAVIOR OF SOME COTTON GENOTYPES UNDER TWO GROWING TECHNIQUES". Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 40, 1, 2015, 99-108. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2015.321132
Abd El-Salam, M., Shaker, S., El-Shoraky, F., Hamed, E. (2015). 'BEHAVIOR OF SOME COTTON GENOTYPES UNDER TWO GROWING TECHNIQUES', Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 40(1), pp. 99-108. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2015.321132
Abd El-Salam, M., Shaker, S., El-Shoraky, F., Hamed, E. BEHAVIOR OF SOME COTTON GENOTYPES UNDER TWO GROWING TECHNIQUES. Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 2015; 40(1): 99-108. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2015.321132

BEHAVIOR OF SOME COTTON GENOTYPES UNDER TWO GROWING TECHNIQUES

Article 2, Volume 40, Issue 1, February 2015, Page 99-108  XML PDF (1.03 MB)
Document Type: original papers
DOI: 10.21608/mjppf.2015.321132
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. A. Abd El-Salam1; S.A. Shaker1; Fathia S. El-Shoraky2; E.M. Hamed3
1(1) Cotton Res. Institute, Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt.
2(2) Institute of Plant Pathology, Cotton and fiber diseases, Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt.
3(3) Horticulture Res. Institute, Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The obtained of complete winter crops, i.e. clover; wheat and faba bean, the farmers tend to late the cotton planting date. This system led to negatively effect on cotton yield. Therefore, comparing the transplanting technique with the seeding method, we aim to change the strategy of cotton agriculture. Seven genotypes namely, Giza 86; G86 x 10229; Giza 88; Giza 92; Giza 93; [G.84 (G.70 x G 51b) ] x S62 and Australian were planted by using two methods, seed sowing and two transplanting date(1May and 1June). The earliness % significantly affected by planting methods, as so as the genotypes, while the interaction between them was insignificant for cotton yield. Also, the first fruiting node had the same reaction. The mean performance of early transplanting date 1 May (T2) exhibited high mean comparing with the late date 1 June (T3)and seeding method (T1). On the other hand, the first fruiting node decreases in transplanting method (early and late date) from 7.43 node for seeding method to 5.22 node for early transplanting and 5.95 node for late transplanting methods. However, lint percentage was not affected by the two methods. Early transplanting in first May (T2) increased seed cotton yield by 1.72   and 2.32 K/F compared with direct seed sowing (T1) and late transplanting in first June (T3), respectively.
Keywords
Cotton- genotypes; transplanting- seedling
Statistics
Article View: 56
PDF Download: 200
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.