El-Shamarka, S., Darwish, I., Khalil, A., Abo Shereif, M. (2019). STABILITY PARAMETER ANALYSES FOR SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN BREAD WHEAT (T. AESTIVUM L). Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 4(4), 303-304. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2019.174887
Sh. A. El-Shamarka; I. H. Darwish; A. N. Khalil; M. A. Abo Shereif. "STABILITY PARAMETER ANALYSES FOR SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN BREAD WHEAT (T. AESTIVUM L)". Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 4, 4, 2019, 303-304. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2019.174887
El-Shamarka, S., Darwish, I., Khalil, A., Abo Shereif, M. (2019). 'STABILITY PARAMETER ANALYSES FOR SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN BREAD WHEAT (T. AESTIVUM L)', Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 4(4), pp. 303-304. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2019.174887
El-Shamarka, S., Darwish, I., Khalil, A., Abo Shereif, M. STABILITY PARAMETER ANALYSES FOR SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN BREAD WHEAT (T. AESTIVUM L). Menoufia Journal of Plant Production, 2019; 4(4): 303-304. doi: 10.21608/mjppf.2019.174887
STABILITY PARAMETER ANALYSES FOR SOME AGRONOMIC CHARACTERS IN BREAD WHEAT (T. AESTIVUM L)
1Prof. of Crop Science, Fac. of Agric., Menoufia Univ.
2Prof. of Wheat Research Field Crops Research Institute, ARC, Egypt
Abstract
The field experiment was carried out using 20 bread wheat genotypes which are (9 commercial cultivars (Gemmeiza 9-Gemmeiza11-Giza168-Sakha94-Shandaweel 1- 1Sids 12-Sids 13-Masr 1 and Masr2) and 11 promising lines) field experiments were conducted for three successive seasons (2009/2010- 2010/2011- 2011/2012). The environments were represented by five locations (EL-Gemmeiza, Sakha, Nubaria, Sids and Shandaweel Agricultural Research Station). 20 genotypes of bread wheat were evaluated under 15 environments. Genotypes number G18 and G15 were superior in yield, with an average of 22.53 and 22.34 rod / fed respectively and superior to some cultivars and other genotypes under study Indicated that genotypes the most stable genotypes were Giza168, G18, G13, Gemmeiza11and G10 with high yield potential. The best genotypes with respect to E5 and E14 were Sids12 and Masr1. for E13, E3, E2 and E7 as well as G20 and G 17.for E6, E1 andE15 were G11. for E4 was Sids13 and shandaweel1 fore E9, E11, E8 and E12 were G12; also show that E1, E9 and E13 were the most discriminative environments for grain yield.